What exactly do you deliver?

Deal materials, built by hand. Institutional-grade financial models (LBO, M&A, DCF valuation, project finance, real estate, infra), investment-committee memos and independent reviews of models you already have. AI systems, built into your stack. The second practice: workflows that run the same work inside your own infrastructure, starting with data-room screening: every answer cited to source and verified by hand.

Who do you work with?

Funds, family offices, independent sponsors and founders. Anyone who needs numbers that hold up in front of an IC, an LP or a board.

Why rhaymi instead of a big firm?

Same institutional standard, without a big firm's lead times, layers or rigid scope. Direct access to $2B+ of live-deal expertise, fast turnaround, and work that flexes to exactly what you need.

Can you review or fix a model I already have?

Yes. Independent model reviews are a core service. I pressure-test your logic, find what breaks, and hand back a defensible, audit-ready version with every change documented.

How do we get started?

A short brief and whatever you have: a CIM, financials, a data room, even a rough sketch. We scope it on a 30-minute call and lock the deliverable, timeline and fixed fee before any work begins.

How long does it take?

Usually a few days to a week, depending on the scope and how urgent it is. The exact timeline is fixed up front, before any work begins.

Is it confidential? Can you white-label?

Yes. Works can run under NDAs, and deliverables can be white-labeled to your template so it ships as your own.

Do you train AI models on our data?

No. Never. Nothing you share is used to train any model. Systems can run in your own cloud, every engagement works under NDA, and your documents stay yours.

Fixed fee per engagement, agreed before any work starts. No hourly surprises. Revisions are included until the model ties and the committee's satisfied.

Rhaymi | Work that survives a committee.

01

Financial Modeling

The model that runs the numbers: fully linked, every driver visible, built to be interrogated.

Levered equity cash flow

Three cases through hold · equity above water by Year 3

BaseDownsideUpside

Returns summary

Base case · fully linked to the drivers

24.1%IRR · 5-yr hold

2.6xMOIC · gross

$370MEquity proceeds at exit

Every figure traces to a driver you can move.

IRR sensitivity

Exit multiple × opening leverage

7.5x8.0x8.5x9.0x 3.5x18.219.621.122.4 4.0x19.421.022.624.1 4.5x20.121.923.825.6

Base case boxed. No cell is an opinion.

Deleveraging profile

Net debt / EBITDA through the hold · sweep fully modeled

Y04.2x

Y13.6x

Y22.9x

Y32.2x

Y41.6x

Debt schedules that tie, quarter by quarter.

02

Executive Memo

The memo that makes the case: your template, every claim referenced back to the model.

Capital structure

Pro forma at close

$1,250MTotal sources

Senior Term Loan B$690M

Mezzanine$210M

Sponsor equity$350M

The case, on paper

Drafted in your template · every claim carries its reference

Investment Committee Memorandum

Project Meridian · Recommendation

Proceed at $86.0m enterprise value, 7.8x FY25 EBITDA⁷. The base case returns 24.1% IRR at 4.2x opening leverage⁸.

The downside case holds above the 1.5x DSCR covenant in every modeled scenario⁹.

7 Exhibit 2 · Sources & uses8 Returns tab9 Covenant grid

Investment thesis

Why the committee should care

Durable organic growth14% 3-yr CAGR
Attractive unit economics71% recurring
Scalable platform for add-ons3 targets mapped
Proven management team2 prior exits

Key risks

Named, sized and mitigated

Customer concentration in top accountMitigated: contract extended through 2029
Macro slowdown impacting organic growthMitigated: recurring revenue at 71%
Key-person dependency in salesMitigated: retention packages signed

03

Model Review & Audit

The independent review that pressure-tests both: every change found, fixed and documented.

Findings by severity

22 findings · every one resolved and documented

High3

Medium9

Low10

Ranked by impact on the decision, not by count.

Audit checklist

Six areas, reviewed line by line

Structure & logicPass

Inputs & assumptionsPass

Calculations & linksRecheck

Financials & outputsPass

Consistency & integrityFixed

Redline: corrections that matter

What changed between v6 and v7, and what it cost

FY26 revenue growth11.4%8.2%−180 bps IRR

Exit multiple9.5x8.5x−220 bps IRR

Maintenance capex2.1% of rev.3.4% of rev.−90 bps IRR

A model you can defend is worth more than a model that flatters.

The Full Sprint.

Model, memo and review in one engagement. One scope, one timeline, one fixed fee.

Scope a sprint

How an engagement runs.

Scope, timeline and fixed fee locked before any work begins. Then the work moves fast.

01

Brief

Send whatever you have: a CIM, financials, a data room, even a rough sketch.

02

Scope

A 30-minute call locks the deliverable, the timeline and the fixed fee before any work begins.

03

Build

Days, not weeks. You see progress as it happens and get questions only when they matter.

04

Deliver

Revisions included until the model ties and the committee is satisfied.

No surprises. By design.

Fixed fee. Agreed first.

Priced per engagement before any work starts. No hourly meters, no scope drift.

NDA and white-label.

Confidential by default. Deliverables can ship under your template, as your own work.

Revisions included.

Until the model ties and the committee is satisfied. Part of the fee, not an extra.

$2B+ of live-deal work.

The same hands that built and defended these materials on live transactions.

Bring the next deal.

A 30-minute call to scope it: deliverable, timeline and fixed fee locked before any work begins. No obligation.

Book the call